toyota mr2 turbo 0 60

Can I label myself a Petrol-Head?

I contemplate it’s fair to say that we all love to label ourselves as being part of something. When at set of beliefs we identified ourselves as being from ‘Archbishop’s’, or if you were a particle bit scummy ‘Canterbury High-frequency’. Then when at uni – especially in a put like Canterbury where two bitter competitor institutions compete for control of the comfy seats in the Penny – you would be predisposed to label yourself as ‘Christ Church’ if you had friends, of ‘UKC’ if you were a bit of a accurate. Even in the sad little world of Transport Planning within which I am now a decisive link, we salute the Scott Wilson flying trousers, and agglomeration scorn on those useless bastards at WSP who couldn’t extrude a decent Transport Assessment if we wrote it, and gave it to them to send out. Their grubby hands would lower its relevance.

Our allegiances stretch further than these straightforward examples however. Our primeval need to be aware part of a tribe is so ingrained on our psyche that we’ll lay down our pints and take up arms of a Friday evening because someone dares to argue that the Mars Bar is the most complete of all the chocolate bars (Which it is). People die for their football teams, people state by Peugeot cars despite being French, and indurate battles were fought in the mid 90’s over whether you were Watering-hole, or Blur.

It does strike me as kind of strange that in these days of endless voice and stainless steel kitchens we still touch the need to be part of a tribe. Surely we should only just no longer care. But I must say that I am as prone to it as anyone else, for I use profanity by Samsung electronic devices, I would rather go to the Penny than Bramleys, I am an unswerving fan of Manchester Joint and McLaren, and I believe that the BTCC is the first-rate race series in the world. And I will dispute with you if you disagree. This stretches into cars as well. I like Jaguar, not Mercedes. I’d have a 599 over a Murcialago. I like Fords, but would rather lick a stinging nettle than have a Hyundai. I tender petrol to diesel. Now on this last point I must well- and perhaps explain my overall position on the moment.

The debate of petrol vs diesel has been succeeding on since diesel became mainstream in the mid 90’s when the French and the Germans began more to a large exporting it. In truth, the early efforts were unavailing. It is a stone cold fact that normally aspirated diesel engines Do Not Business. They are noisy, rattley, smelly, and are so lacking in power that the concept of running anything other than a Vietnamese electricity generator off of one is impiousness quite frankly. As an illustration of this, virtuous look at the range of ‘SDI’ engines that the Volkswagen catalogue make; yes, they give good economy, but anything that accelerates from 0-60 in over 15 seconds should technically be classed as either indifferent, or a topographical feature. I’ve spent the last 5 years flourishing out of a Saturday delivering furniture in a Over which is blessed with a 2.5litre N/A diesel, and it’s discharge was akin to that of The Queen Mother – as she is now. Also, at anything over about 3000 revs, your eardrums were guaranteed to implode.

Without thought this, I rather like modern turbo diesels. They can give striking performance (just look at the good diesels Audi and BMW produce) with the added gain of good fuel economy and low emissions. Also, there is not any that compares to the wave of torque and acceleration that comes with putting your foot down in a current diesel – it is satisfying fair to the very core of one’s being. If Audi produce the R8 TDI like they’re imminent to, I’m absolutely convinced that it will re-write the supercar rulebook, and I’m also satisfied that in an in-gear acceleration fight, the TDI will cap pretty much anything you could think of baring a Veyron. In spite of this however, I think my petrol headedness means that I will forever pick petrol over the menacing stuff.

You see I am currently saving for a new car, as my every so often old-fashioned with my beloved Ka is nearly up due to my father damaged it back. As much as I may like one, I’m not in the market for buying another Ka - unless someone has a Frisk Ka for £1000 going – and have indisputable to up-size to something with a bit of grunt. Initially I was contemplating a Peugeot 306 D-Turbo, but having vacillated for a meet period of time, I feel that I would be doing myself a harm buying a car simply because it will do a million miles to the gallon – I must stand for by my love for cars and buy something rather less practical. This brings me on to my options that I have researched, and shall lay out to you in a way by which you can referendum as to what I finally buy.

Honda Prelude 2.0 I-16 4WS
Now I differentiate that the name is a mouthful, so let me break it down for you; 2.0 is the square footage of the engine, I-16 means it’s a 16 valve injection, and 4WS means four-whirl location steering.
The reasons I have gone for the ‘Lude is its unburstable reliability, it’s ‘mini NSX’ looks, and the certainty that it goes pretty well. Other pluses take in the relatively low insurance group, and the information that it’s last owner was likely to have been about 100 years old, and called Arthur. The four-neighbourhood steering endows it with sharp handling, and the 150Bhp mechanism means it is no slouch. Bad things are that the sills are predisposed to rust. Here are the vital statistics:

Power – 150 Bhp
Top go like a bat out of hell – 130mph (approx)
0-60 time – 8 seconds (approx)
Motorway MPG – 38 (approx)
Figure for a good ‘n - £800

Honda Prelude 2.2i Vtech
Yes, I identify, it’s the same car. Well no actually, it isn’t. This model came in later and is endowed with even more power, utter reliability, and the same four-turn steering as its predecessor. It looks easy on the eyes good, and goes like the clappers, however it too is subject to rust around the rear arches, and guaranty is a bit steeper what with it being in group 17. Still, here are the vitals:

Power – 186 Bhp
Top Dispatch – 0ver 140mph
0-60 time – 6.8 seconds
Motorway MPG – 40 (approx)
Cost out for a good ‘n - £850

Toyota MR2 GT
Right, this is where I get odd. I realise it is a boy-racer car, but it has rear whither drive, is mid-engined and looks superior, and the insurance isn’t too shabby despite being in coterie 17. Other pluses include the certainty that it is highly unlikely to go wrong, and by all accounts the handling is coruscating. Servicing costs aren’t horrendous either. I’m tempted by the T-Bar as it has purloin-out glass panels in the roof so on a summers day I have vast head room – thoughts?
Vitalizing statistics:

Power – 167 Bhp
Top Promote – 137mph
0-60 time – 7.7 seconds
Motorway MPG – 38 (perchance more)
Price for a good ‘n - £1200

Nissan Bluebird Turbo
If my match up Jim reads this he will have just wet himself as he loves these old cubes; so much so that he has now owned three. The strength of the turbo is that it is a turbo-charged car that won’t break, which is very unusual. So it isn’t that high and handles like an office govern, but so what? It pops and whistles like a turbo should, and the cover is cheap as chips. It looks a bit crummy, but at least my friends will fit in this one!
Vitals:

Power – 136 Bhp
Top Hightail it – 125 (approx)
0-60 time – 8 seconds (approx)
Motorway MPG – 38 (maybe)
Honorarium for a good ‘n - £600

Please come back to me with your theory on my choices!

Source: Everything Motoring

Toyota MR2 0-140Mph

toyota mr2 turbo 0 60: 1992 Toyota MR2 n/a going from 0 to 140Mph

toyota mr2 turbo 0 60 in the News

Profile: Automotive performance apps for the iPhone - Macworld

Macworld, CA - Sep 29, 2008

Use: Automotive performance apps for the iPhone I was impressed when it found figures for both my 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo and our 2004 Honda Pilot. While you can guard run data on a per-vehicle basis,

Strong rise in entries for Kaitangata Hillclimb - Drivesouth

Drivesouth, New Zealand - Oct 07, 2008

DrivesouthStrong acclivity in entries for Kaitangata Hillclimb The person whose name is drawn will receive a run with Hey in his ultra-quick Nissan SR20 turbo-powered Toyota MR2. The car was the fastest two-wheel-run

toyota mr2 turbo 0 60 in the Blogs

Toyota MR2 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Japanese MR2 GT beau id was able to accelerate from 0-100 km/h in 5.6 s. ... Toyota also did the same with their Supra Twin Turbo model, offering a ...

Toyota MR2 Classifieds!
... MR2 - Spyder(0) MR2 Audio For Garage sale(0) MR2 Misc For Sale(0) Wanted ... 91 mr2 na 5speed tranny. HKS EVC 5 Black Limited. ST205 AW Intercooler 3sgt. 95 Mr2 turbo ...

1992 Toyota MR2 Turbo 1/4 mile Drag Racing timeslip specs 0-60 ...
Swift 1992 Toyota MR2 Turbo 1/4 mile drag racing videos and timeslips ... 1992 Toyota MR2 SW20 T88 Turbo: 0.000 @ 0.000 in the 1/4 mile ...

1992 Toyota MR2 SW20 T88 Turbo Dyno Sheet Details - DragTimes.com
Tightly 1992 Toyota MR2 SW20 T88 Turbo 1/4 mile drag racing videos ... can vote for this Toyota MR2 SW20 T88 Turbo to be the featured ... (0-60, arrange, upgrades ...

YouTube - MR2 - 0-60MPH Run
Using GTech meter measuring Toyota MR2 Turbo 0 to 60MPH rhythm. Measured time was 4.7 seconds. ... Using GTech meter measuring Toyota MR2 Turbo 0 to 60...

Modern Racer - Features - Used Cars - Toyota MR2 Turbo
0-60 mph : 6.1 sec. Restraint Weight : 2888 lbs(T-top coupe) Overall length : 164.2 in. ... 1991-1995 Toyota MR2 Turbo. 1994-1997 Mazda Miata. 1992-1994 Volkswagen ...

Supercars.net - 1991 Toyota MR2 Turbo
industrial specs and images for 1991 Toyota MR2 Turbo ... 1991 Toyota MR2 Turbo. www.supercars.net. Specifications. Engine & Transmission. Body / Chassis ...

Toyota MR2 Turbo version Beta
Toyota MR2 Turbo vBeta. Merit. A. 0-60. 4.5 sec. 0-100. 9.9 sec. Top Speed. 148mph. Price - career mode ... Click here to download the Toyota MR2 Turbo ...

Toyota MR2 Technical Information Page
Technological information for the various variants of the Toyota MR2 by Michael Canny, bhp, top speed, 0-60 times - rest of site includes a buying landmark, photos, ...